Should there be a difference? My proposal is that [mac] relates to hardware, [osx] relates to the software, and [apple] relates to the company specifically.
|
|
|||||||
|
|
I think that if we have an [apple] tag, it will be used in a way that doesn't add any value. Maybe we can use [apple inc] for questions related to the company, and ban the use of |
|||||
|
|
I agree with KeithB, [apple] is very vague to what it actually refers to in any given situation. [apple inc] is kinda strange, but still better. [mac] is related to hardware questions about all macs. We should of course have [macmini], [imac], etc. for different models. [osx] is regarding the operating system and it's built in functionality, excluding standalone applications like AddressBook, Safari, iCal etc. As a side note, how about [snow-leopard], [tiger] etc? Is it better or worse than [osx 10.6], [osx 10.5]. And is it possible to alias tags? Like the aforementioned [tiger] <-> [osx 10.4]. |
|||||||||
|
|
I think that yes, they should be a difference. The moto of the site says "Beta Q&A site for power users of Apple hardware and software". As they will have questions on iPad, Mac or the company itself, we should make a difference on these tags. |
||||
|
|
|
Absolutely, I agree Macintosh is just a brand of hardware made by Apple. That's the way of reality. What's wrong with using the real-world identifiers? How about: [apple] is the name of the company, [macintosh] or [mac] is the name of the computer line, [ios] is software that runs on the i-devices such as iPhones, iPods and iPads, [macos] or [osx] is the software that runs on the Macintoshes. This is how it is in the real world and not very complicated at all. You can use multiple tags anyway. |
|||
|